For fifty years GACC has worked closely with our local authorities to limit, and whenever possible reduce, aircraft noise and disturbance. With strong support from our local MPs we have put forward constructive proposals to government, many of which have been implemented.
We pressed for the installation of proper noise monitors at Gatwick, and these were installed. We then pressed for penalties on aircraft which caused excessive noise, and these were imposed on aircraft taking-off.
We pressed hard for similar penalties on aircraft approaching Gatwick. This campaign failed but the Continuous Descent Approach procedure (which slightly reduces approach noise) was introduced instead.
In 2001 GACC initiated and played a leading role in negotiating the s.106 agreement by which BAA accepted a legal obligation to halve the area covered by the 57 leq noise contour between 1996 and 2008. That was achieved.
For many years GACC has been campaigning to reduce the disturbance caused by night flights at Gatwick. We have succeeded in getting the quotas reduced, and in securing a gradual but progressive reduction in the volume of noise at night. And the noisiest types of aircraft have been banned at night.
In September 2011 we submitted an important Evidence Paper on Noise and Health to the Transport Department as preparation for the new White Paper.
The Noise Action Plan.
Under the EU Environmental Noise Directive Gatwick is required to produce a plan to reduce noise. We pressed in 2009 for improvements in the first Gatwick Airport Noise Action Plan. and are continuing to apply pressure on the airport (in conjunction with the local councils,through the airport noise committee) to implement the promises made in the Action Plan. See Gatwick noise committee minutes. In November 2013 Gatwick Airport suddenly produced a (slightly) revised noise action plan to run until 2018 and gave only four working days for comments. GACC obtained a longer period for comments and informed our members. We submitted this response
Regurgitated Noise Action Plan.
In September 2014 Gatwick produced a new noise action plan. But on examination it turned out to be the same document which they published in November 2013 - definitely past its sell-by date.
Number affected by noise set to double
GACC is shocked that the number of people significantly affected by aircraft noise is set to double under the airport's master plan for over 100 extra flights a day - on the existing single runway. See press release.
GACC has also pointed out that many of the figures in the master plan for employment and economic benefit set out in the master plan are rubbish. See critique.
NOISE CONTOUR MAPS
Produced annually by the Department for Transport (DfT), these maps are useful for measuring changes from one year to another, or for comparing one airport with another. They show the average noise (leq) for an average summer day. The average noise should not be confused with the maximum noise (lmax) measured in decibels (dBA)
The 57 leq contour is taken by DfT as indicating the onset of significant community annoyance, based on surveys at Heathrow. But in rural areas noise causes greater disturbance because background noise is lower, and causes more annoyance because the expectation of peace is greater.
The number of people within the Gatwick 57 leq contour was 9,000 in 2000, 3,650 in 2012 and 3,250 in 2013. For full details and the detailed maps see CAA report.
A research study (ANASE) commissioned by the Department for Transport found that the level of annoyance is considerably higher than indicated by the leq contour maps, and that as the standard of living rises people expect to live in a quieter environment.
Aviation Policy Framework White Paper
The Aviation Policy White Paper published in July 2012 contained a number of policies for which GACC had pressed. These included:
- That ‘the benefits of future technological improvements should be shared between the airport and its local communities to achieve a balance between growth and noise reduction.’
Recognition that the 57 leq contour is not a good measure of the ‘onset of community annoyance.’ A lower noise contour to be used in future, as proposed by GACC.
- That tranquillity in areas of outstanding beauty should be given greater priority.
It was, however, disappointing that some of the tougher policies which GACC had proposed, and which were included in the draft White Paper, were deleted (probably as a result of lobbying by the airlines) in the final version. See press release. GACC policies included in the draft White Paper:
- Stricter noise limits on departing aircraft, and higher penalties for breaches of these limits.
- Penalties on airlines which fail to achieve the noise reduction technique of continuous descent approach.
- More noise monitors, especially under the approach paths.
- Night flights to pay higher landing fees. GACC had suggested a levy with the proceeds used to compensate local residents.
An example of white paper which looks impressive but is not as strong as it might be.
Details are given in a CAA booklet.
GACC has pressed the Department for Transport to reduce the noise limits, and a reduction was contained in the Draft Aviation Policy Framework. but no action has been taken. In the 1990’s GACC campaigned for noise limits to be imposed on aircraft when landing, as for taking-off. This was subject to a major study by the Department for Transport with ten noise monitors deployed between Gatwick and Tunbridge Wells. But in the end objections from the airlines killed off the idea. GACC has pressed the Department to re-consider the scheme based on the annual average performance of each airline.
According to the Department for Transport, aircraft departing from Gatwick in 2005 emitted 4.4 million tonnes of CO2. The latest DfT forecast is for 3.8 million tonnes in 2030 This makes it one of the most CO2 producing sites in the South East.
Gatwick Airport, in August 2009, published a report on Gatwick and climate change. Read this report. In it they state that: "Climate change is a serious global issue and one of the greatest threats facing the world today. In the UK, CO2 emissions from UK aviation doubled between 1990 and 2000, whilst the combined activities of the rest of the UK reduced by about 9%. The UK has the highest volume of [aviation] CO2 emissions in Europe."
GACC has produced a critique of this report. Read this important document.
See also GACC booklet (2007): Gatwick - wrecking climate change targets.
The Climate Change Act 2008 set a target to reduce UK domestic greenhouse gas emissions - excluding aviation - by 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. The official Climate Change Committee, charged with implementing the Act, has set a target for the aviation industry - to reduce aircraft CO2 emissions to 2005 levels by 2050. They have stated that demand for air travel will need to be limited to an increase of 60%, and the increase in flights to 55%. Even if aviation emissions are reduced to 2005 levels by 2050, the rest of industry will have to make cuts of 85%.
There is also a separate quota system based on noise, with noisy aircraft using more points. Aircraft are classified as QC1, QC2, QC4 etc. A QC4 aircraft uses four points and makes twice as much noise as a QC2. A QC2 uses two points and makes twice as much noise as a QC1. There has been a change in classification which makes it difficult to compare past and future figures.
The Government has carried out one consultation on the system for controlling night flights. They have now proposed to make virtually no changes until 2017 - see Latest News.
Gatwick has more night flights than Stansted, and twice as many as Heathrow. The total level of noise permitted at night each year at Gatwick is greater than at Stansted but less than at Heathrow.
For many years the airport has had a target that 40% of passengers should arrive or depart by public transport (to reduce pollution and pressure on the road system). The target was achieved for the first time in 2010. The proportion of staff traveling by public transport has increased as a result of the new Fastway bus system but is still only about 25%